Some notes:vitalik's "What do I think about biometric proof of personhood?"

Source: https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/07/24/biometric.html

Proof of personhood, "unique-human problem", to identify a real person without revealing which real person it is.

Related projects: 

Proof of Humanity

BrightID

Idena

Circles

Gitcoin Passport

Sismo(Zero-knowledge), 

Worldcoin(co-founded by Sam Altman, using a piece of specialized hardware called "the Orb" to scan user's iris).

Issues:

Privacy issues:  technology to solve this,  zero knowledge proof

Accessibility issues: Proof of Humanity (using only a smartphone)

Centralization issues: 

1,Centralization risks in the system's top-level governance (esp. the system that makes final top-level resolutions if different actors in the system disagree on subjective judgements).
2,Centralization risks unique to systems that use specialized hardware.
3,Centralization risks if proprietary algorithms are used to determine who is an authentic participant.

Security issues:

3D-printed fake people

Possibility of selling IDs

Phone hacking

Government coercion to steal IDs

Others: 

ZK-ML technologies 

Social graph-based verification:

Proponents: 

not rely on special-purpose hardware

avoids a permanent arms race

not require collecting biometric data

potentially more friendly to pseudonymity

give a more nuanced numerical score,

weaknesses:

not get lucky in the initial bootstrapping process.

Privacy, leaking info about a person's social relationships

Inequality, a wealthy and socially well-connected person could use their connections to generate many IDs

Risk of collapse into centralization

 

  Social-graph-based General-hardware biometric Specialized-hardware biometric
Privacy Low Fairly low Fairly high
Accessibility / scalability Fairly low High Medium
Robustness of decentralization Fairly high Fairly high Fairly low
Security against "fake people" High (if done well) Low Medium